I read a lot of productivity books on a variety of subjects. Most modern books are nothing more than a compilation of the author’s blog posts bound with glue and paper (or in bytes for eBooks).
What makes a book a book?
- A lot of research – a book of thoughts is just a blog.
- Hard evidence – a book that draws anecdotal evidence is just an opinion piece.
- Original analysis – a book that simply collects data and documents and presents it is another form of spam.
- Authority on the matter – are you a certified expert respected by industry peers? Do you have the credentials to speak on the matter?
- Value – does your book make a difference in the world? Have you created something that doesn’t already exist or have you simply regurgitated garbage? Remember, garbage in garbage out.
A PDF document is not a book
I see way too many poorly written and badly designed PDF’s pawned off as eBooks. Isn’t that just a document? What have you done to justify the $29.95 price for your collection of blog links and articles. A traditional book goes through a very rigorous editorial process, most likely eliminating that book from consideration even when it’s just an idea.
Way too much fluff
A lot of books I read does have some really good ideas, covered in mountains of fluff. Most books can be condensed into three pages of good points. Instead, it goes on and on with anecdotal stories and markets the author’s services.
Thoughts?
I hope I piss off a lot of people. I’m counting on it. Can you relate to my point above? Let me know.
Maybe these types of books should be peer reviewed, like science journal articles. And perhaps they should be condensed down to 5-10 pages. However, the scientific publishing industry also has its problems.. so it's not a real solution.
Read more fiction! Those should always be read in its entirety. 🙂
It might be the book industry's desire to publish and sell books rather than distribute useful and good content. Seems like much is must marketing now a days.