<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Crowd Sourcing to Improve the Issue Management Process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danielhoang.com/2009/06/28/using-crowd-sourcing-to-improve-the-issue-management-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danielhoang.com/2009/06/28/using-crowd-sourcing-to-improve-the-issue-management-process/</link>
	<description>Consulting, Business Development, Analyzing, Writing, Presenting, and Traveling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Hoang</title>
		<link>http://www.danielhoang.com/2009/06/28/using-crowd-sourcing-to-improve-the-issue-management-process/comment-page-1/#comment-1472</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Hoang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 00:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielhoang.com/?p=425#comment-1472</guid>
		<description>Thanks Benedictus. I intended this not necessarily as an endorsement of IdeaScale but rather a &quot;crowdsourced&quot; platform to collect ideas and promote/demote for issue management. What I envision the tool to be is more a closed system only to the members of the project team, rather than open to the web.

What you mentioned regarding comments on these platforms hold true on all. Even comments on blogs, this one included, are subject to search engine queries. A dumb comment might follow you around for a long time.

I&#039;ll do a little research on some of the points you highlighted to confirm and make my readers aware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Benedictus. I intended this not necessarily as an endorsement of IdeaScale but rather a &#8220;crowdsourced&#8221; platform to collect ideas and promote/demote for issue management. What I envision the tool to be is more a closed system only to the members of the project team, rather than open to the web.</p>
<p>What you mentioned regarding comments on these platforms hold true on all. Even comments on blogs, this one included, are subject to search engine queries. A dumb comment might follow you around for a long time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll do a little research on some of the points you highlighted to confirm and make my readers aware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benedictus de Spinoza</title>
		<link>http://www.danielhoang.com/2009/06/28/using-crowd-sourcing-to-improve-the-issue-management-process/comment-page-1/#comment-1313</link>
		<dc:creator>Benedictus de Spinoza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielhoang.com/?p=425#comment-1313</guid>
		<description>Hey Daniel,

Nice post. But it primarly focusses on the potential use of Ideascale for the initiator. I didn&#039;t read that many negatives. And believe me there are many.

A friend of mine participated on a Ideascale platform under his real name. Stupid. This ideascale platform was the opengov.ideascale.com. In the spur of the moment he wrote a lot of nonsense. Giving his opinions and spoofs on government policy. This platform was being heavily used. The result it had on Google was immense. Not one of his heavily used social networks could top this platform. So now he&#039;s screwed (pardon my french). Whenever he is Googled, this nonsense pops up.

Besides this, the platform doesn&#039;t even have a opt-in opt-out usage for mail. Once you participate you get mail as long as this platform is active. And once you have written something you can&#039;t delete it. You don&#039;t have an account which you can cancel.

So the reference to Ideascale being a bottom-up approach can in this case be taken literally.

Kind regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Daniel,</p>
<p>Nice post. But it primarly focusses on the potential use of Ideascale for the initiator. I didn&#8217;t read that many negatives. And believe me there are many.</p>
<p>A friend of mine participated on a Ideascale platform under his real name. Stupid. This ideascale platform was the opengov.ideascale.com. In the spur of the moment he wrote a lot of nonsense. Giving his opinions and spoofs on government policy. This platform was being heavily used. The result it had on Google was immense. Not one of his heavily used social networks could top this platform. So now he&#8217;s screwed (pardon my french). Whenever he is Googled, this nonsense pops up.</p>
<p>Besides this, the platform doesn&#8217;t even have a opt-in opt-out usage for mail. Once you participate you get mail as long as this platform is active. And once you have written something you can&#8217;t delete it. You don&#8217;t have an account which you can cancel.</p>
<p>So the reference to Ideascale being a bottom-up approach can in this case be taken literally.</p>
<p>Kind regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Hoang</title>
		<link>http://www.danielhoang.com/2009/06/28/using-crowd-sourcing-to-improve-the-issue-management-process/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Hoang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielhoang.com/?p=425#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>Cool, my post made it on the IdeaScale/QuestionPro blog. Check it out: http://blog.questionpro.com/2009/07/crowd_sourcing_to_improve_the.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, my post made it on the IdeaScale/QuestionPro blog. Check it out: <a href="http://blog.questionpro.com/2009/07/crowd_sourcing_to_improve_the.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.questionpro.com/2009/07/crowd_sourcing_to_improve_the.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
