Post image for Using Crowd Sourcing to Improve the Issue Management Process

Using Crowd Sourcing to Improve the Issue Management Process

by Daniel Hoang on June 28, 2009

While issue management is not specifically addressed by the Project Management Institute (PMI) Project Management Book of Knowledge (PMBOK), it is a key process necessary for effective project management. An issue is something that requires a decision made and associated actions performed. It is a situation that has occurred or will occur, as oppose to a risk that is a potential of a situation to occur. Typically, issues are tracked from a simple whiteboard, to a spreadsheet, to a full scale issue tracking and management system.

Issue management systems serves its purpose. However, it requires issues to be categorized and classified by the project management team. Feedback by the project team or end users require each issue to be assigned and prioritized. Often, team members and end users complain about the lack of transparency on the prioritization process. What gets ranked critical vs. high vs. low priority. In a previous post, I introduced you to using IdeaScale as a tool to solicit customer feedback and ideas. An alternative use of the tool is to implement it as an issue management system. Rather than priorities defined and assigned in a top down approach, using IdeaScale allows you to “crowd source” a bottom up approach.

Here are the conceptual steps to process from issue submission to closing.

  1. Team member (and end user) identifies an issue or or problem that requires attention or decision.
  2. The team member logs onto the IdeaScale portal and submits the issue.
  3. All team members (and end users) access the portal to review the issues list, and vote up or down, the priorities of each issue.
  4. Over time, and with critical mass usage of the portal, priority issues will rise to the top while less important issues will remain at the bottom. Ideas that reach a critical threshold (through the voting mechanism) will be assigned to an owner and tracked as part of the project management process.
  5. After the issue is addressed and resolved, the “idea” is closed by the site administrator.

Develop Issue Management and Escalation Procedures

The first step to building an issue management process is to document the associated procedures. The State of California Office of System Integration defines the issue and escalation process as follows:

The Issue and Escalation Process describes how the project identifies, tracks and manages issues and action items that are generated throughout the project life cycle. The process also defines how to escalate an issue to a higher-level of management for resolution and how resolutions are documented.

Since the focus of this article is to crowd source the tracking of issues, here is a great example by the State of California, Office of System Integration – Issue and Escalation Process.

Implement IdeaScale to Capture and Monitor Issues

As shown below, the IdeaScale entry page can be customized to collect the information you need to properly manage the issues submitted. By default, the required fields include title/subject and description. In this example, I included stakeholders affected, due date, decision required, and suggested action. A category field is used to segregate issues vs. suggestions. As team members and end users submit their ideas, it gets included in the issues list. Other end users and team members can log into the portal and vote up, and down, the issues that are relevant to them.

Issue Submission

For the IdeaScale method of issue tracking and management to work, it requires a critical mass of users. Crowd sourcing a task requires active participation in the community. If only a handful of users actual log in and submit issues and vote, then it emulates the traditional form of issue management. However, if a large enough group of users consistently log in and participate actively, then the concept of crowd sourcing issue management will work.

The bottom up approach of issue management increases transparency in the process. Users are part of the discussion and actually have input through the voting mechanism. The community polices itself and prevents abusers from rigging the system. Through IdeaScales API’s, the issue management system can be integrated to the project portals such as SharePoint, or other project management tools.

Bottom Line

As with any tool, whether it be a simply paper list, Excel spreadsheet, or a crowd sourced IdeaScale issue tracking system, it does not replace good project management and communication with the team. Before attempting to implement the described process, determine if the readiness of the project team and willingness to participate in the process.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

{ 3 comments }

1 Daniel Hoang July 1, 2009 at 6:30 pm

Cool, my post made it on the IdeaScale/QuestionPro blog. Check it out: http://blog.questionpro.com/2009/07/crowd_sourcing_to_improve_the.html

2 Benedictus de Spinoza September 24, 2009 at 4:40 pm

Hey Daniel,

Nice post. But it primarly focusses on the potential use of Ideascale for the initiator. I didn’t read that many negatives. And believe me there are many.

A friend of mine participated on a Ideascale platform under his real name. Stupid. This ideascale platform was the opengov.ideascale.com. In the spur of the moment he wrote a lot of nonsense. Giving his opinions and spoofs on government policy. This platform was being heavily used. The result it had on Google was immense. Not one of his heavily used social networks could top this platform. So now he’s screwed (pardon my french). Whenever he is Googled, this nonsense pops up.

Besides this, the platform doesn’t even have a opt-in opt-out usage for mail. Once you participate you get mail as long as this platform is active. And once you have written something you can’t delete it. You don’t have an account which you can cancel.

So the reference to Ideascale being a bottom-up approach can in this case be taken literally.

Kind regards

3 Daniel Hoang October 17, 2009 at 5:22 pm

Thanks Benedictus. I intended this not necessarily as an endorsement of IdeaScale but rather a “crowdsourced” platform to collect ideas and promote/demote for issue management. What I envision the tool to be is more a closed system only to the members of the project team, rather than open to the web.

What you mentioned regarding comments on these platforms hold true on all. Even comments on blogs, this one included, are subject to search engine queries. A dumb comment might follow you around for a long time.

I’ll do a little research on some of the points you highlighted to confirm and make my readers aware.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Video Tutorial: IdeaScale – Crowd Source Your Feedback

Next post: Five ways to automate and outsource life